 |
 |

EXCLUSIVE REPORTS
'Beep beep'
Tanning guru goes after patent infringers in unconventional manner
David Wethe
Staff Writer
|
 |
When defending the four-year-old patent
for his automated sunless tanning booth, inventor Tom Laughlin
looks to the crafty Roadrunner in the Warner Brothers cartoon
for advice.
"The Roadrunner knows there's a lot of other ways to get
that truck off the road without standing in front of it and waving
it down," Laughlin said. |
|
|
In the same way, Laughlin uses what he calls two
unconventional approaches to stopping patent infringement
.
After inventing his automated sunless tanning booth in 1997 and
patenting it two years later, Laughlin estimates he's filed more
than 50 patent-infringement lawsuits naming at least 100 companies
and individuals. Unlike conventional tanning beds that use ultraviolet
rays, Laughlin's invention sprays a fine mist of tanning solution
onto the skin to give the appearance of a tan without the harm
of UV exposure.
|
Laughlin said he has confiscated two unlicensed
booths from undisclosed tanning-salon chains based in the Midwest
and Southwest and is going after three more manufacturers.
|
The standard approach, Laughlin said, is to send
a letter to an alleged "infringer" telling the person
to stop. But the problem with that, he said, is the company could
quickly file suit against him for sending a threatening letter.
Laughlin sues the alleged infringer right away and posts the lawsuit
on his Web site. Internet search engines pick up the information,
and potential investors see the suit when doing their research.
|
|
Bob Chiaviello, a partner in Fulbright & Jaworski's
intellectual property section in Dallas, said he doesn't know
of too many clients who will go that far.
Because Laughlin's patent is intended to be broad -- covering
everything from the making of the booth to its operation -- he
said no one else is allowed to build an automated sunless tanning
booth without a license from the patent holder, Grapevine-based
Laughlin Products Inc.
Mystic Tan, a subsidiary of Dallas-based Palm Beach Tan, is the
only other company licensed to build an automated booth besides
Laughlin's subsidiary, Mist-On Systems.
Laughlin also goes after tanning salons that buy unlicensed booths,
but said patents are bad for entrepreneurs.
|
 |
"A lot of people question the usefulness of
a patent," he said. "By definition of a patent, you
have to disclose everything that's required for a reasonable person
to patent the item. So, you have to tell (someone) exactly how
to do it."
Chris Rentzel, head of the trial group for Bracewell & Patterson's
Dallas office, said it's hard to know when an inventor is being
ripped off.
"Here, it strikes me that there's a risk of thinly capitalized
competitors just springing up anywhere and everywhere taking advantage
of this technology," he said.
|
According to a 2001 survey of patent lawsuits in
Texas, each side will spend an average of $500,000 to go through
a suit with less than $1 million at risk.
Laughlin says he has a six-digit "war chest," mostly
from the license royalties, that he uses as a patent defense fund.
|
|
Laughlin spends about half his time on patents
and the other half on his Mist-On Systems, which garners about
$10 million a year through the sale of automated sunless tanning
booths.
As a result, Laughlin has had to learn a lot about patents.
"One slip up, and it could be fatal for you. Alligator
wrestling's kind of like that," he said. "You're not
allowed too many mistakes."
|
|
| Contact DBJ writer David Wethe at dwethe@bizjournals.com
or (817) 693-0025. |
© 2003 American City Business
Journals Inc.
|
|
 |
 |